A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes

A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes
Author :
Publisher : National Academies Press
Total Pages : 53
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780309260534
ISBN-13 : 0309260531
Rating : 4/5 (34 Downloads)

Book Synopsis A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes by : Institute of Medicine

Download or read book A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes written by Institute of Medicine and published by National Academies Press. This book was released on 2012-08-20 with total page 53 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed research is commissioned or noncompetitively awarded research that is not competitively solicited because of specific reasons, such as time limitations or highly focused or constrained research topics. The scientific merit assessment processes have been developed by NASA to evaluate individual directed research tasks in order to ensure the scientific integrity of the HRP's directed research portfolio. The committee examined the HRP's current scientific merit assessment processes and conducted a public workshop to identify best practices among other federal agencies that use various assessment processes for similar types of directed research. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report finds that the scientific merit assessment process used by the HRP for directed research is scientifically rigorous and is similar to the processes and merit criteria used by many other federal agencies and organizations - including the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture - for comparable types of research. This report also makes recommendations on ways to streamline and bolster the accountability and transparency of NASA's current processes.


A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes Related Books

Evaluation of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Review Process
Language: en
Pages: 165
Authors: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Categories: Medical
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-12-19 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The medical research landscape in the United States is supported by a variety of organizations that spend billions of dollars in government and private funds ea
Strategies to Leverage Research Funding
Language: en
Pages: 193
Authors: Institute of Medicine
Categories: Medical
Type: BOOK - Published: 2004-11-27 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Since 1992 the Department of Defense (DOD), through the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, has received congressionally earmarked appropriations f
A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes
Language: en
Pages: 53
Authors: Institute of Medicine
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2012-08-20 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed re
Evaluation of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Review Process
Language: en
Pages: 165
Authors: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Categories: Medical
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-01-19 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The medical research landscape in the United States is supported by a variety of organizations that spend billions of dollars in government and private funds ea
Evaluating Federal Research Programs
Language: en
Pages: 95
Authors: Institute of Medicine
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 1999-02-10 - Publisher: National Academies Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), passed by Congress in 1993, requires that federal agencies write five-year strategic plans with annual perfor